Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Who does better know America?Belafonte, John Gibson or?

I'm sure most of us agree that it is terrible to turn on the TV and hear obviously biased incorrect political diatribe being expressed. As we have said in the past, it plays good to your audience but serves no public service. It does however do a disservice to themselves and the society they supposedly know and care about. In this case I noticed on biased fox news that john Gibson's show last night was titled who knows America Better Belafonte or me? The answer is obviously neither.
First off that isn't the question. The question is who speaks the truth Belafonte or Gibson and the answer is again neither. Gibson pleasured himself in doing nothing but stupidly demeaning Belafonte just making fun of him. Let's hear some truth here. Belafonte called President Bush the greatest terrorist in the world and Gibson suggested that statement might be treasonous. Voicing the truth is not treasonous and many of us think the President is our biggest problem not the terrorist. I do agree with Gibson that it was wrong for Belafonte to say millions of Americans agree with Chavez's revolution. I can't say I care one way or the other but some of you but not millions do agree with Belafonte.
My fault is with the fact that neither side voices the truth, knows, or represents what we the people feel and believe. Gibson goes on to show his chasm of reality as to average Americans. He said we are too busy stuffing our 401(k) accounts. He said we are too busy financing our new cars, houses, and going on vacation to care about Chavez. I think most of the lower classes are too busy reeling from what the president continues to do to them and keeping themselves afloat period. Gibson was wrong again in stating that many of us benefit from corporations so we like them. Get real John! He finished off his proof that he knows nothing about America by stating that Chavez and Belafonte should sell their revolution somewhere else. I say that Gibson should be the one to take his revolution elsewhere. What do you think?
James Joiner
Gardner, Ma
www.anaveragepatriot

No comments: